Governance report
STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT
The Board of Murray & Roberts Holdings Limited (“Board”), in
promoting and supporting the highest standards of business
integrity, ethics and corporate governance, and in adopting the King
III Code of Governance Principles (“King III”), continued to conduct
the business of the Group with prudence, transparency, integrity
and accountability, and is pleased to deliver this integrated
annual report.
The Board has continued on its journey of meeting the requirements
of King III and in particular its “apply or explain” principle. While
the Group does not yet fully apply all of the principles of King III,
the following additional areas of application were achieved in relation
to the year under review:
|
Passing of a non-binding advisory vote on the Company’s 2011
remuneration policy |
|
Development, approval and implementation of a policy and plan
for a system and process of Group-wide risk management |
|
Development and approval of a policy and plan for a system and
process of Group-wide regulatory compliance that delivered
limited assurance of compliance in relation to the South African
environment |
|
Outline of a comprehensive and effective IT governance policy
and plan |
|
Development, approval and implementation of a risk-based
internal audit policy and plan, and fully embedding internal audit
as a Group-wide function |
As noted above, Murray & Roberts has not yet fully applied all of King III’s governance principles (and recommended practices), and the
following table lists the requirements of King III that have not yet fully been applied:
|
King III Principle |
|
Murray & Roberts Application |
|
Action plans to apply principle |
|
|
Governance of risk |
|
|
4.1 |
The Board should be
responsible for the
governance of risk. |
|
A more comprehensive risk management plan was
developed and considered by the Board. |
|
The Board will continue to receive
and review a risk report bi-annually. |
|
|
4.5. |
The Board should ensure
that risk assessments are
performed on a continual
basis. |
|
A comprehensive Group-wide risk assessment was carried
out and, based on the findings, an updated risk register was
prepared and considered by the Board. |
|
The risk register will be submitted
to the Board bi-annually. |
|
|
The governance of information technology |
|
|
5.1. |
The Board should be
responsible for information
technology (“IT”) governance. |
|
IT has been added and will feature as a regular agenda item
for future Board meetings. |
|
Independent assurance on the
effectiveness of the IT internal
controls is to be provided to
the Board through the Group’s
internal audit function. |
|
|
5.2. |
IT should be aligned with the
performance and sustainability
objectives of the company. |
|
IT was previously decentralised across the Group. Following
the reorganisation of the Group into a cohesive structure
entailing a strong corporate office supporting five operating
platforms, the IT function now reports directly to the Group
financial director. A Group-wide IT strategy has been
developed and is being implemented. This strategy will
ensure a consistent and coordinated approach to IT
governance and controls across the Group.
An IT Charter has been finalised for approval. The Charter
defines the governance structures, primary responsibilities
for each of the structures as well as the reporting framework
to ensure appropriate Board oversight of IT is performed in
a timely manner. |
|
|
|
|
5.4. |
The Board should monitor
and evaluate significant IT
investments and expenditure. |
|
Significant IT investments and expenditure are currently
controlled and monitored by the IT Steering Committee. |
|
Significant IT investments and
expenditure will be monitored and
evaluated by the Audit& Sustainability Committee and a
summarised report will be presented
to the Board. |
|
|
5.5. |
IT should form an integral part
of the company’s risk
management. |
|
Compliance with IT laws has not been formally assessed. |
|
The Group-wide regulatory
compliance plan includes IT laws,
rules, codes and standards, and
provides appropriate assurance to
the Board. |
|
|
5.6. |
The Board should ensure that
information assets are
managed effectively. |
|
Information security and the protection of information assets
are primarily managed at a business level and the
requirement for a more centrally and formally defined
information security function has been identified. |
|
An IT security policy and plan is
under development, and will be
implemented as soon as they have
been considered and approved by
the Board. |
|
|
Compliance with laws, rules, codes and standards |
|
|
6.1. |
The Board should ensure that
the company complies with
applicable laws and considers
adherence to nonbinding rules,
codes and standards. |
|
While the Board reviews compliance and adherence by the
Group with laws, rules, codes and standards through the
Social & Ethics Committee, limited assurance of compliance
in a South African context was provided in the year under
review. |
|
The Social and Ethics Committee will
monitor Group compliance and the
report of the Compliance Officer will
be presented to the Board.
The regulatory compliance plan will
be extended through the 2013
financial year to cover the Group’s
international operations. |
|
|
6.4. |
The Board should delegate
to management the
implementation of an effective
compliance framework and
processes. |
|
A complete compliance framework, including controls and
processes, has been approved and implementation is
underway.
On this basis, assurance of the effectiveness of the controls
and processes has not yet been established. |
|
Implementation of this framework is
planned for the 2013 financial year;
following which assurance on the
effectiveness of the controls and
processes will be provided to the
Board. |
|
|
Governing stakeholder relationships |
|
|
8.1. |
The Board should appreciate
that stakeholders’ perceptions
affect a company’s reputation. |
|
Stakeholder perceptions are measured in isolated cases, for
example, client and employee satisfaction surveys are
undertaken. However these measurements are not
pervasive across the Group. |
|
A stakeholder engagement policy
that will assist the Board to gauge
stakeholder perceptions is being
formulated. |
|
|
8.2. |
The Board should delegate to
management to proactively
deal with stakeholder
relationships. |
|
A stakeholder engagement framework has been developed
and will be rolled out Group-wide. |
|
As noted above, the Group is
formulating a stakeholder
engagement policy. |
|
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
At the date of this report, Murray & Roberts had a unitary Board with
13 directors, of whom 10 are independent non-executive directors
and three are executive directors. The composition of the Board
promotes a balance of authority and prevents any one director from
exercising undue influence over decision-making.
The Board is the highest governing authority in the Group and has
ultimate responsibility for corporate governance. It appreciates that
strategy, risk, performance and sustainability are inseparable and the
Board is responsible for approving the strategic direction of the
Group, which integrates these elements. The Board is governed by a
charter that sets out the framework of its accountability, responsibility
and duty to the Company.
The Board has a fiduciary duty to conduct its business in the best
interest of the Company and, in discharging its duty, ensures that
the Group performs in the best interests of its stakeholders.
The Company’s key stakeholders include present and future
investors, customers, business partners, employees, regulators
and the communities in which it operates.
The Board
|
Provides ethical leadership and gives direction to the Group
in all matters |
|
Approves the strategic plan developed by management and
monitors its implementation |
|
Acknowledges that strategy, risk, performance and sustainability
are inseparable by: |
|
– |
satisfying itself that the strategy and business plans do not give
rise to risks that have not been thoroughly assessed by
management |
– |
monitoring the governance of key risk areas and key
operational performance areas, including IT |
– |
endeavours to ensure that the strategy will result in
sustainable outcomes |
– |
considering sustainability as a business opportunity that guides
strategy formulation |
|
|
Directs the commercial and economic fortunes of the Company |
|
Endeavours to ensure the Company is a responsible corporate
citizen by considering the impact of the business operations of the
Company on its people, society and the environment |
|
Endeavours to ensure measurable corporate citizenship policies
are developed and programmes implemented |
|
Monitors the Company’s compliance with all relevant laws,
regulations and codes of business practice, and considers
adherence to non-binding rules and standards through a
compliance framework |
|
Monitors the Company’s communication with all relevant
stakeholders (internal and external) openly and promptly, on the
basis of substance over form |
|
Endeavours to ensure that shareholders are treated equitably |
|
Endeavours to ensure that disputes are resolved effectively and
expeditiously |
|
Defines levels of materiality, reserving specific powers to itself
and delegating other matters by written authority to management |
|
Monitors performance through the various Board committees
established to assist in the discharge of its duties without
abdicating its own responsibilities |
|
Endeavours to ensure directors act in the best interest of the
Company by adhering to legal standards of conduct, disclosing
real or perceived conflicts to the Board and dealing in securities
only in accordance with a developed policy |
|
Determines policies and processes to ensure the integrity
and effectiveness of |
|
– |
risk management, risk-based internal audit and
internal controls |
– |
executive and general remuneration |
– |
external and internal communications |
– |
director and chairman selection, orientation and evaluation |
– |
the annual integrated report |
|
Directors are required to act with due attentiveness and care in
all dealings and to uphold the ethics and values of the Company.
Accordingly, they are required to adhere to a Code of Conduct that
incorporates agreed standards of accepted behaviour and guidance
on decision-making, promotes integration and coordination, and
reaffirms the directors’ commitment to the Group.
BOARD MEETINGS
The Board meets formally at least five times a year. In addition,
directors meet ahead of the scheduled meeting at which the Group’s
budget and business plan is examined in the context of an approved
strategy. At this meeting, the directors engage with senior executives
on the implementation of the Group’s strategy.
The Board has adopted a policy to visit key operations on an annual
basis. During the year under review, the Board visited the Medupi
power station project. The chief executive keeps all directors
informed between meetings of major developments affecting the
Group. The record of attendance at Board meetings for the year is
reflected in the of this report.
CHANGES TO THE BOARD
During the year, the Board appointed TCP Chikane as non-executive
director. Due to other business commitments, non-executive director,
ADVC Knott-Craig, resigned during the year. Non-executive director,
AA Routledge has indicated, that after more than 18 years of service,
he will not be available for re-election and will retire at the 2012
annual general meeting.
SP Sibisi has indicated that he wishes to limit his non-executive
directorships to institutions focused on science or technology. As a consequence he will resign as a non-executive director. NM Magau
has indicated that she will resign having served on the Board for
the past eight years. Both these resignations will be effective at
the conclusion of the 2012 annual general meeting.
RC Andersen who has served as independent non-executive
chairman over the past almost nine years has given notice of
his intention to retire as a director and chairman of the Company
effective 1 March 2013. The Board has unanimously agreed
to appoint M Sello as independent non-executive chairman following
the retirement of RC Andersen.
CHAIRMAN AND GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE
The roles of chairman and Group chief executive are separate.
They operate under distinct mandates issued and approved by
the Board. The mandates clearly differentiate the division of
responsibilities within the Company and ensure a balance of power
and authority.
The chairman, an independent non-executive director, presides over
the Board, providing it with effective leadership and ensuring that all
relevant information is placed before it for decision. The Group chief
executive is responsible for the ongoing operations of the Group,
developing its long term strategy, and recommending the business
plan and budgets to the Board for consideration and approval.
The Board appoints the chairman and the Group chief executive.
The Board appraises and appoints the chairman annually and the
remuneration & human resources committee appraises the Group
chief executive annually. This committee also assesses the
remuneration of the Board, chairman and Group chief executive.
The nomination committee is responsible for Board
succession planning.
BOARD COMMITTEES
The Board has established and mandated a number of permanent
standing committees to perform specific work on its behalf in various
key areas affecting the business of the Group.
They are the:
|
Executive committee |
|
Audit & sustainability committee |
|
Health, safety & environment committee |
|
Nomination committee |
|
Remuneration & human resources committee |
|
Risk management committee |
|
Social & ethics committee |
Shareholders elect the members of the audit & sustainability
committee at each annual general meeting. The audit & sustainability
committee still forms part of the unitary Board even though it has
statutory duties over and above the responsibilities set out in its
terms of reference.
Although all the committees assist the Board in the discharge of its
duties and responsibilities, the Board does not abdicate its
responsibilities. The Board and each committee give attention to new
and existing governance and compliance matters according to their
respective mandates. A statement from the chairman of the Board
and chairman of each committee, other than the executive
committee, is included in this report.
Each committee operates according to a Board-approved terms
of reference. With the exception of the executive committee, an
independent non-executive director chairs each committee.
The committee chairmen are appointed by the Board.
Each committee chairman participates fully in setting the agenda
and reporting back to the Board at the board meeting that follows a committee meeting. In line with King III and as mandated by the
individual terms of reference, each committee chairman attends
the annual general meeting and is available to respond to shareholder
questions on committee activities.
During the year, all committees, other than the executive committee,
conducted a self-assessment of their effectiveness with positive
outcomes in each case. All committee terms of reference were also
reviewed and updated.
The record of attendance of the respective committees for the year is
reflected in record of attendance section of this report.
SELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board has an approved policy on the selection and continuation
of office for directors, and the nomination and evaluation processes
to be followed. One third of directors are required to retire annually by
rotation and, if put forward for re-election, are considered for
reappointment at the annual general meeting. All directors are
appointed at the annual general meeting by a shareholders’
resolution. The Board is permitted to remove a director without
shareholder approval.
The nomination committee considers and makes appropriate
recommendations to the Board on the appointment and re-election
of directors. This process encompasses an annual evaluation of skills,
knowledge and experience, considers transformation imperatives and
ensures the retention of directors with an extensive understanding of
the Company. All recommended director appointments are subject
to background and reference checks: Re-election of directors to the
Board is made according to a formal and transparent process. Each
non-executive director is provided with a formal letter of appointment.
For newly approved directors there is an induction programme to
familiarise them with the Group.
The names of directors standing for re-election at the 2012 annual
general meeting are contained in the resolutions of the annual general
meeting.
As recommended by King III, the Board, assisted by the nomination
committee, assessed the independence of the non-executive
directors. All non-executive directors meet the criteria for
independence as set out in King III.
INDEPENDENT ADVICE
There is an agreed procedure for directors to seek professional
independent advice at the Company’s expense.
BOARD AND COMMITTEE EFFECTIVENESS
External appraisal of the effectiveness of the Board, its committees
and individual directors were conducted during the year. The appraisals
were benchmarked against the Group’s strategic requirements
and the need to ensure the capacity to deliver these requirements
and strengthen the diversity and sector expertise of directors.
The appraisals were positive and their recommendations are being
followed through for implementation. An internal appraisal of the
chairman was led by the chairman of the remuneration & human
resources committee and discussed by the Board. The appraisal
was positive.
GROUP SECRETARY
All directors have access to the advice and services of the Group
secretary who is responsible for ensuring the proper administration of
the Board, sound corporate governance procedures and assisting
with best practice as recommended in King III. All directors have full
and timely access to information that may be relevant to the proper
discharge of their duties. The Group secretary provides guidance to the directors on their responsibilities according to the prevailing
regulatory and statutory environment, and the manner in which such
responsibilities should be discharged. The Board is responsible for
the appointment and removal of the Group secretary.
E Joubert was
appointed as Group secretary effective 1 August 2012, succeeding
Y Karodia, who has taken up a senior financial position within
the Group.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES
The directors of Murray & Roberts Limited serve as members of the
executive committee of the Board, chaired by the Group chief
executive. The directors support the Group chief executive in:
|
Implementing the strategies and policies of the Group |
|
Managing the business and affairs of the Group |
|
Prioritising the allocation of capital, technical know-how and
human resources |
|
Establishing best management practices and functional standards |
|
Approving and monitoring the appointment of senior management |
|
Fulfilling any activity or power delegated to the executive
committee by the Board that conforms to the Company’s
memorandum of incorporation |
RISK MANAGEMENT, SYSTEMS OF CONTROL
AND INTERNAL AUDIT
The Board promotes the rational engagement of risk in return for
commensurate reward and is responsible for ensuring that risk
management, including related systems of internal control, are
formalised throughout the Group. These systems of risk management
aim to promote the efficient management of operations, the
protection of the Group’s assets, compliance with legislative
environments ensuring business continuity and providing reliable
reporting in the interests of all stakeholders. Details of the Group’s
risk management process.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND SHARE DEALINGS
Directors are obliged to disclose their shareholdings, additional
directorships and any potential conflicts of interest, direct or indirect,
that may arise, at every meeting of the Board. These are
appropriately managed and recorded in the minutes.
In accordance with the JSE Listings Requirements and the prohibitions
contained in the Security Services Act, the Group has an insider
trading policy. It requires directors and officers who may have
access to price sensitive information to be precluded from dealing
in Murray & Roberts Holdings Limited’s shares as well as the shares
of listed subsidiary, Clough Limited for a period of approximately two
months prior to the release of the Group’s interim results and a
period of three months prior to the release of the Group’s annual
results. To ensure that dealings are not carried out at a time when
other price sensitive information may be known, directors, officers
and participants in the share incentive scheme must at all times
obtain permission from the chairman, Group chief executive or Group
financial director before dealing in the shares of the Group. The
Group secretary is notified of any share dealings and, in conjunction
with the corporate sponsor, publishes the details of dealings in the
Group’s shares by directors that have been approved on the Stock
Exchange News Service (“SENS”) of the JSE Limited. All approved
director dealings are reported to the Board.
SPONSOR
Deutsche Securities (SA) Proprietary Limited acted as sponsor during
the period under review in terms of the JSE Listings Requirements.
|